課程名稱 |
東亞憲法變遷比較專題 SEMINAR ON EAST ASIA COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM |
開課學期 |
96-2 |
授課對象 |
法律學院 法律研究所 |
授課教師 |
張文貞 |
課號 |
LAW7389 |
課程識別碼 |
A21 M9470 |
班次 |
|
學分 |
2 |
全/半年 |
半年 |
必/選修 |
選修 |
上課時間 |
星期五3,4(10:20~12:10) |
上課地點 |
社法研3 |
備註 |
限碩士班以上 且 限法律學院學生(含輔系、雙修生) 總人數上限:24人 |
Ceiba 課程網頁 |
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/962eastasiaconlaw |
課程簡介影片 |
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
課程大綱
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
課程概述 |
在當代自由民主憲政秩序的發展上,東亞國家愈來愈占有相當之份量,尤其在1980年代末期,南韓及臺灣相繼成為全球表現亮眼之新興民主憲政國家後,更是如此。去(2007)年,是日本戰後憲法實施六十週年,也是中華民國憲法實施的六十週年;今年(2008)年,則是南韓戰後憲法制定六十週年,南韓憲法法院正式運作二十週年,也是我國司法院大法官正式運作六十週年。這些時間點上的契合,其實不只是巧合,也清楚呈現日本、南韓及台灣這三個東亞的憲政民主國家從二次戰前到戰後彼此間在政治、經濟、制度與文化間相互影響、甚至依賴的關係。因此,在台灣思考或研究比較憲法、甚或憲法學理之相關問題,不能再僅僅是唯歐美國家是瞻,東亞國家,尤其是日本及南韓的發展,我們所不能也無法忽略。尤其是南韓,不但民主化之經歷及過程與台灣有類似之處,在政府制度的選擇也同樣偏向總統制,更在1988年設立憲法法院採納抽象之司法違憲審查制度。這些,都使我們在研究憲法的相關議題上,更應該理解、甚至參考南韓的制度與經驗。 |
課程目標 |
由於語言的限制,東亞各國間事實上也沒有相通之語言,要研究日本及南韓之憲法發展(包括憲法以及憲法裁判)其實並不容易。所幸,在近年全球比較研究風潮之下,各國都愈來愈重視將相關之憲法發展,尤其是最高法院或憲法法院之裁判,予以英文化。日本、南韓以及台灣,都相繼將其最高法院或憲法法院之重要裁判(甚至是全部的裁判)加以完整英譯,這也提供使用英文研究者一個更寬廣之比較研究的契機。本課程正是希望藉由廣泛閱讀日本以及南韓重要之憲法裁判,才深入理解其戰後制憲以來之憲法變遷(包括修憲及釋憲)的發展,並以此來對照台灣經驗,甚至進而發展出東亞之憲法發展經驗或理論。 |
課程要求 |
這門課程事實上定位在廣泛之資料蒐集以及初步之文獻閱讀,希望在初步閱讀之後,進一步篩選出日本及南韓在比較憲法意義下真正具有指標性之判決,將來再作深入之分析。因此,修課同學對本課程其實也是一個共同的參與者或研究者,一起與授課教師來進入此一東亞憲法研究領域,探探其中是否有令人深感興味之發現。對新議題、對理解日本南韓近年發展特別有興趣之同學,或對比較憲法研究有初步之興趣者,皆為本課程所歡迎加入的對象。 |
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
Office Hours |
每週一 15:30~17:30 備註: 除固定時間外,亦可事先預約其他時間 |
指定閱讀 |
|
參考書目 |
日本及南韓法院之判決,參見教師編製之課程講義,講義電子
檔放置於本課程之非同步教學網站。
*指定閱讀文獻 #參考閱讀文獻 ※日本法院裁判 @南韓法院裁判
|
評量方式 (僅供參考) |
No. |
項目 |
百分比 |
說明 |
1. |
課堂報告及討論 |
50% |
|
2. |
期末報告 |
50% |
|
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
第1週 |
2/22 |
導論與課程說明介紹 |
第2週 |
2/29 |
日本戰後憲法之制定及發展
*Lawrence W. Beer, Japan’s Constitutional Law: 1945-1990, in THE CONSTITUTIONAL CASE LAW OF JAPAN, 1970 THROUGH 1990 3-30 (Lawrence Beer & Hiroshi Itoh eds., 1996)
*The Constitution of Japan (1947), authoritative translation by the Ministry of Justice of Japan, in THE CONSTITUTIONAL CASE LAW OF JAPAN, 1970 THROUGH 1990 (Lawrence Beer & Hiroshi Itoh eds., 1996) |
第3週 |
3/07 |
本週停課乙次,同學自行閱讀文獻 |
第4週 |
3/14 |
南韓戰後憲法之制定及民主化發展
*Chung-Si Ahn, Transformation of South Korea Politics and Prospects for Democratic Consolidation, in POLITICS AND ECONOMY OF REGIME TRANSFORMATIONS: CASE STUDY OF SOUTH KOREA AND CENTRAL EUROPEAN COUNTRIES 23-40 (Chung-Si Ahn & Chon-Pyo Lee eds., 1999)
*Chong Jong-sup, Political Power and Constitutionalism, in RECENT TRANSFORMATIONS IN KOREAN LAW AND SOCIETY11-32 (Dae-Kyu Yoon ed, 2000)
*The Constitution of Republic of Korea (1987), reprinted in CHONGO CHOI, LAW AND JUSTICE IN KOREA: SOUTH AND NORTH (2005) |
第5週 |
3/21 |
南韓民主化發展與司法違憲審查
*Kun Yang, The Constitutional Court and Democratization, in RECENT TRANSFORMATIONS IN KOREAN LAW AND SOCIETY11-32 (Dae-Kyu Yoon ed, 2000)
*Tom Ginsburg, Rule by Law or Rule of Law? The Constitutional Court of Korea, in JUDICIAL REVIEW IN NEW DEMOCRACIES: CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS IN ASIAN CASES 206-46 (2003) |
第6週 |
3/28 |
本週停課乙次,同學自行閱讀文獻
*拜訪日本最高法院網站(http://www.courts.go.jp/english/)及南韓憲法法院網站(http://english.ccourt.go.kr/)
#KOSEKI SHOICHI, RAY A. MOORE ED., THE BIRTH OF JAPAN’S POSTWAR CONSTITUTION (1997).
#Graham Hassall & Cheryl Saunders, Asia-Pacific Constitutional Systems (2002).
前述資料之中文摘要及討論詳見East Asian Constitutionalism Study Group的部落格網站 http://eastasianconstitutionalism.blogspot.com/ |
第7週 |
4/04 |
清明節/婦幼節,放假乙次 |
第8週 |
4/11 |
司法權與司法違憲審查制度:南韓
*Chapter 1 (Introduction of Constitutional Adjudication System to Korea and its Development, in THE FIRST TEN YEARS OF THE KOREAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT 1-15 (The Constitutional Court of Korea, 2001)
*Chapter 2 (The Constitutional Court and its First Ten Years) in THE FIRST TEN YEARS OF THE KOREAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT 15-71 (The Constitutional Court of Korea, 2001)
*The Constitutional Court Act, reprinted in The First Ten Years of The Korean Constitutional Court 357-79 (The Constitutional Court of Korea, 2001) |
第9週 |
4/18 |
司法權與司法違憲審查制度:日本
※ Case Concerning the National Police Reserve, 1952 (Ma) No. 23, 1952.10.8, 昭和27.10.08
※ Objection to the Validity of the National Referendum for the Justices of the Supreme Court, 1949 (O) No.332, 1952.02.20 昭和27.02.20
※ Action for Recognition of the Status as a Member of the House of Representatives and a Claim for Remuneration, 1955 (O) No.96, 1960.06.08, 昭和35.06.08*
※ Case of immediate appeal against a decision on the case of the status of a judge, 1998 (Bun-Ku) No. 1, 1998.12.01,平成10.12.1+ |
第10週 |
4/25 |
立法權與國會:日本v.南韓
※Case to seek for nullification of an election, 2003(Gyo-Tsu)No. 15, 2004.01.14,平成16.1.14
※Judgment on utterance by a member of the diet in an interpellation, 1994(O) No.1287, 1997.9.9,平成9.9.9+ (僅有中文翻譯)
※Invalidation of a Seat, 1995(Gyo-Tsu) No.19, 1995.5.25,平成7.5.25+ (僅有中文翻譯)
@Ntional Assembly Candidacy Deposit case, (KCCR 199, 88Hun-Ka6, September 8, 1989) (summary)
@National Seat Succession case,(6-1 KCCR 415, 92Hun-Ma153, April 28, 1994) (summary)
@Legislative Railroading case,( 9-2 KCCR 154, 96Hun-Ra2, July 16, 1997) (summary)
@Excessive Electoral District Population Disparity case, (7-2 KCCR 760, 95Hun-Ma224, etc., December 27, 1995) (summary) |
第14週 |
5/23 |
財產權與經濟自由:日本v.南韓
1)財產權
※Judgment upon case of violation of Property Rights and Due Process of Law [as to application of Article 118 of the Customs Law is unconstitutional], 1955(A)No.2961, 1962.11.28, 昭和37.11.28*
※Case to claim the reversal of disposition to reject the application for the purchase of state-owned farmland, 1973 (Gyo-Tsu) No.24, 1978.7.12, 昭和53.07.12+
※A case on a claim for the return of profits made from short swing trades, 2000(O)No.1965, 2000(Ju)No.1703, 2002.2.13,平成14.2.13
2)契約自由
※Judgment upon case of seeking affirmation of the existence of a contractual labor relationship, 1968(O)No.932, 1973.12.12, 昭和48.12.12+(基本權對第三人效力)
3)工作權及職業自由
※Judgment upon case of criminal immunity related to dispute tactics of employees of public corporations, etc., 1964(A)No. 296, 1966.10.26, 昭和41.10.26*(勞動權)
※Claim for Cancellation of the Denial of License for Sale of Alcohol, 1988(Gyo-Tsu) No.56, 1992.12.15, 平成4.12.15+(僅有中文翻譯)
※Judgment upon case of constitutionality of the act to regulate location of pharmacies, 1968(Gyo-Tsu)No.120, 1975.04.30, 昭和50.04.30*
@南韓部分待補 |
第16週 |
6/06 |
生存權與社會權:日本v.南韓
※Judgment upon case of the ability of a succession of a litigation concerning the right to receive livelihood protection, 1964(Gyo-Tsu)No.14, 1967.05.24, 昭和42.05.24*
※Case to revocation of a disposition to deny promotion, revocation of a disposition to order dismissal from school, etc, 1995 (Gyo-Tsu) No. 74, 1996.3.8,平成8.3.8+ (受教權及宗教自由)
@南韓部分待補 |
第17週 |
6/13 |
客座教授 Tom Ginsburg 專題演講
正當法律程序:日本v.南韓
※Judgment on the co※Judgment upon case of violation of Property Rights and Due Process of Law [as to application of Article 118 of the Customs Law is unconstitutional], 1955(A)No.2961, 1962.11.28, 昭和37.11.28*
※constitutionality of the measure taken by the Presiding Judge to prohibit spectators from taking notes in the courtroom, 1988(O)No.436, 1989.03.08, 平成元3.8+*
※Case to be brought for bodily injury and rape, 2004 (A) No. 1618, 2005.04.14,平成17.7.14
※Case to seek damages, 1999 (O) No.1767,2002.9.11,平成14.9.11+ (限制請求國賠)※Case to be brought for intrusion upon habitation and violation of the Law Concerning the Punishment of Physical Violence and Others, 1970 (A) No. 1700, 1972.12.20, 昭和47.12.20*
@南韓部分待補 |
|